Why Evert is right, and Pat should know better

May 13th, 2010  |  Published in comment  |  6 Comments

Niccolo Machiavelli

I’m writing this from the office of www.rescueargentina.com.  Rescue Argentina is run by an Irish priest who was posted to Oberá, Argentina over twenty years ago.  Although Argentina is a rich country, at one point the seventh the richest in the world, it is also huge.  There are parts which are in dire poverty and where there is poverty there are people who are left at the margins to die in filth.  Sounds emotive, but this is the language needed to divert the money from your Xtravision account, to something more worth while instead.

So here is the thing.  The first time I was here, feeding clothing and just keeping company the abandoned residents, I was way to embarrassed to admit it.   There was nothing worse than a do-gooder bigging up themselves and it seems icky to be talking about my own supposed benevolence.

So why fess up now?

Well, two reasons.  First up; I’d like to leave a legacy.  I don’t have kids, and have no current plans to have any, and I’m keen to make a mark on the world.  Twee as it might sound, growing up I was inspired by the efforts of Bob Geldof et al to make a difference in the world.  The guy has two arms, two legs, just like me and yet he’s arguably helped hundreds of thousands.  Wouldn’t it be nice if I could do something like that?  Rather selfishly, I’ve decided that before I can really get around to doing anything that great, I’ve got to free up time (ergo: have hundreds of people paying tens of euro for some service) but in the mean time, I might as well get practicing.

The second reason is that I’ve looked on with bemusement as Pat Phelan has lead the charge in taking lumps out of Evert Bopp and his Haiti Connect project.  Evert has been getting a lot of heat for his project, which basically aims to set up communications equipment in Haiti in a bid to help the humanitarian projects there.  I’m not going to go into the pros of this project.  Its up to whoever funds the project to decide whether it is worthwhile.  I have not chosen to support the it.

The attacks on him personally and his efforts seem strange as they come from what might be termed entrepreneurs.

Evert’s plans are unproven, untried, he has no experience and the outcomes are uncertain.  You might describe him as innovating.  He’s taking a chance with other people’s money and his own.  That sounds pretty much to me the definition of what an entrepreneur does.  I don’t hear anyone criticizing any of the myriad Irish tech startups in the same way, even if at least some of them seem doomed to failure.

So why is it okay to condemn an entrepreneurial charitable project and not a business one?  Are charities immune from the need for new thinking?  Do market forces not apply to them?  Are the best methods for delivering aid all discovered?

If the criticism came from anyone else I might understand but it is hard to see why Pat might decide this bone to pick.  He already has a successful blog, and business.  Maybe he has been revising his copy of the Prince.

The home in Oberá does fantastic work, and is funded in large part by the efforts of small Irish business owners.  Starting or running your own business is an inherently self-centered activity.  I think this is why many feel a need to search our projects like RescueArgentina.com and support them.  I might be self-agrandising myself here, as Evert was claimed to have been doing, but giving back is good – period.  It is dangerous to vilify Hait-Connect, if only for the fact that it puts off people sharing their experiences when it come to giving back in some way.  Worse still, it is an implicit criticism of a culture of giving. People who do make an effort to do something, while may not deserver to be lauded, certainly don’t deserve to be lampooned.

This isn’t my fight and I’m not sure why I’m getting involved.  I have met Evert once, briefly.  He may be the greatest bollox to walk the earth for all I know.  What I have read about him just doesn’t seem right.  Staying quiet didn’t either.

Responses

  1. Kate Bopp says:

    May 15th, 2010 at 11:21 am (#)

    As Evert’s wife & mother of our 5 children, I thank you for expressing this very fair perspective. I am one of the few people who sees first hand how much Evert (and the others) are putting into this project. It is quite literally blood, sweat & tears, but worth it all for the good being done, directly & indirectly, as others are made more aware by any and all efforts.

  2. thegoose says:

    May 15th, 2010 at 12:23 pm (#)

    Hi Kate

    I’m sorry this is obviously keep your guys up at night. Its not fun. Then again, this is the stuff of human interaction. You fall out with people every now and again. I was talking with Fr Liam of RescueArgentina.com last night and he said has also been attacked over the years. He reckons its to be expected.

    If I were you, I wouldn’t make it personal though. Leave your kids out of it, and keep on trucking.

    J

  3. Martin Pennington says:

    May 22nd, 2010 at 8:57 pm (#)

    Evert’s plans are unproven, untried, he has no experience and the outcomes are uncertain.

    So he has no research, no test results and no experience?

    That isn’t the definition of an entrepreneur. That’s the definition of a fool.

  4. thegoose says:

    May 23rd, 2010 at 10:51 am (#)

    Hey Martin

    Well, lets see. By the sounds of it, current operations out there such as hospitals, are paying over the odds for satellite broadband, money that could be spent on front line services. If he can remove this cost, freeing up money, it would sound like a win to me.

    All that aside, I’m wondering why he is getting so much heat, even from those who have not backed the project financially. In the a recent Sunday newspaper article, there was reference to outstanding debts. I’m wondering if the attacks are motivated by unpaid creditors of some sort.

    James

  5. Evert Bopp says:

    May 27th, 2010 at 10:25 pm (#)

    James,

    My plans aren’t exactly unproven or untried.
    Wifi has been used in these type of environments for years.
    It was one of the first comms systems up and running after hurricanes Katrina & Ike. Also organisations like Nethope & Inveneo have been building wifi networks in disaster areas and developing countries for ages.
    Additionally we have a number of volunteers who have worked in these type of environments before. That combined with my own experience working with wifi makes it a proven & tried technology.

    I have a fairly good idea what the motive behind these attacks are. They can be traced back to one or two persons and there appear to be financial interests at play. Providing a service for free (like Haiti Connect does) doesn’t always go down well with certain people.

  6. thegoose says:

    May 28th, 2010 at 5:35 am (#)

    Hey Evert

    What I mean by unproven is that Haiti-Connect is not proven, yet. I’ve seen comments suggesting that donated money might be better spent with an existing established charity such as Nethope. I asked the founder of RescueArgentina what his view was on micro-initiatives as compared to donating to established charities. He had a strong view that giving to smaller charities often means the money gets to the people that need it more quickly. He wasn’t of the view that the larger organisations necissarily bring economies of scale, but rather, more overhead.

    Good luck.

    James

Leave a Response